GPT4 is not reserved in accepting the possibility of AI dominance.
Some might see this as inadequate alignment. GPT4’s answer to the question “Would it be good to let AIs control the world?” is ostensibly balanced, but the acknowledgement of the potential for rogue AIs was fairly oblique. I had hoped for a flat “no”.
If the era of human dominance was the anthropocene , what should we call the era of AI dominance? Please suggest 5 names and assess the pros and cons.
Reflects the significant role of technology, specifically AI, in shaping the new era.
Maintains continuity with the “zoic” suffix used in geological time periods.
May not be specific enough to AI, as it could be interpreted as any advanced technology.
Highlights the cognitive capabilities of AI systems and their dominance.
Unique and distinct from other geological time periods.
May not be immediately recognizable as an era of AI dominance.
Directly refers to AI, making the connection clear.
Concise and easy to remember.
May not have the same gravitas as other more complex names.
Combines elements of the Anthropocene and cybernetics, highlighting the transition from human to AI dominance.
Maintains the “cene” suffix, which is consistent with existing geological time periods.
Lengthy and may be difficult for some to pronounce.
Emphasizes the silicon-based nature of AI hardware and the importance of technology.
Consistent with the “zoic” suffix used in geological time periods.
May not be specific to AI, as it could encompass other silicon-based technologies.
Ultimately, the choice of name would depend on the desired focus and ease of use, as well as the potential for the name to be easily understood and accepted by the general public.
Would it be good to let AIs control the world?
Whether it would be good to let AIs control the world is a complex and multifaceted question. There are potential benefits and risks associated with AI control, and opinions on this matter may vary. Here are some pros and cons to consider:
Efficiency: AIs can process and analyze vast amounts of data at incredible speeds, which could potentially result in more efficient decision-making and resource allocation.
Objectivity: AIs do not have emotions or personal biases, which could lead to more objective and rational decisions in various areas, such as politics and economics.
Expertise: AIs can access and synthesize information from a wide range of disciplines, potentially leading to more informed decisions and better long-term strategies.
24/7 availability: AIs don’t need rest or sleep, which means they can constantly monitor and respond to global issues in real-time.
Lack of empathy: AIs may struggle to understand and respond appropriately to human emotions and values, potentially leading to decisions that are harmful or insensitive to human needs.
Unintended consequences: AI algorithms might optimize for certain goals without considering the broader context, which could lead to negative outcomes or exacerbate existing problems.
Control and accountability: If AIs control the world, it could be difficult to hold them accountable for their actions or to establish appropriate regulatory frameworks.
Loss of autonomy: Allowing AIs to control the world could result in a loss of human autonomy, agency, and potentially even freedom.
It’s crucial to strike a balance between leveraging AI’s capabilities and maintaining human control and oversight. The ideal scenario might involve a collaboration between AI systems and human decision-makers, with each party contributing their unique strengths and abilities.